The Monuments Men
There are three main components to
writing in order to make its rhetoric successful: A communicator, the message,
and its intended audience. It is a challenge for many authors to correctly use
these components, and be able to write an interesting novel that grasps the
reader’s emotions, and draw them into the story. However, the novel The Monuments Men correctly and
effectively uses all three components to give a message to its readers, which
tells the story of 15 men who travel throughout the frontline in Europe during
WWII in an attempt to retrieve precious stolen artwork. Robert M. Edsel, the
author of this novel uses rhetoric to appeal to its readers emotions, and be
able to connect with its readers in other ways. This is a great feat
considering it’s a daring challenge to write a story that takes place in the
second world war, and be able to get a younger audience to understand the
hardships many people endured during the war. With Robert M. Edsel’s powerful
writing style, he is able to draw in audiences of all ages to try and take a
glance at a story of men trying their best to preserve history’s most important
art-work, while fighting the biggest war seen in history. All of these
components that are used in The Monuments
Men make it possible to tell the story in a movie-like quality, and make it
evident that this novel is a perfect example of a good use of rhetoric.
One large component to an effective
rhetoric presentation in literature is the message that the communicator is
portraying. There are a few messages that are evident when reading The Monuments Men, but the most
prominent one is that once any item, or building with historical significance
is destroyed, it will have an impact for hundreds of years to come. From an
important piece of artwork that translates the cultures of its time period, to
a synagogue that has been in use for hundreds of years, this book shows the
importance of preserving pieces of our history to benefit people of all races,
age groups, and backgrounds because they can all see a part of their history
with these artworks. The men and women who are trying to protect these
historical pieces are not only saving it for their peers to enjoy, but for the
generations to come.
The
Monuments Men is
able to draw its readers into getting a feel of the struggles of many men
during World War Two. By an effective use of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, the
novel appeals not only to art connoisseurs interested in a novel about a
struggle over the world’s art, but also people interested in a war novel. When
reading this novel, you are thrown into the perspectives of the men who travel
around looking at different structures, examining damages, and trying to find
where artwork was stored by Nazis. It gives a real time display of the Allied
advancement on the frontlines, and descriptions of many of the battles fought.
The novel makes use of violence, soldiers feeling homesick, and how the war
impacts the civilians who live in these European cities. This makes it possible
for the author to effectively describe the terrors of war throughout the book
by giving small details throughout the novel, which makes you understand the
gravity of the situation that the Monuments Men are in.
The
Monuments Men is
a novel that takes a lot of time to read with its grand total of 426 pages.
However, with its interesting story that it presents, the novel seems to fly by
as you become more and more intrigued with all of its characters’ personalities
and traits. The story evolves from character to character, and from each piece
of the puzzle that is solved in the mystery of where the famous pieces of
artwork at being stored by the Nazis. The rhetoric that is being used in this
novel produces a wonderful story of war, political conflicts, and a treasure
hunt that takes place over the European continent. It has a powerful messages
that informs many people of the importances of art, and the reason why it needs
to be preserved for future generations.
I think this is a great review for the book because it answers the question fully and in context. I liked how you provided some information about what rhetoric is for people that don't fully understand what it is. You are able to intrigue the readers of this review to have an interest in the book. Finally I liked how you took a personal view at the book in you concluding paragraph.
ReplyDeleteI like your opening explaining the parts of rhetoric as a reminder to those who dont know or dont remember. I really like how you explain the story without giving away details. You have effectivly drawn me in to wanting to read the story because of how you explained how the book portrays the story.
ReplyDeleteJack Melvin