Lone Survivor
LutTELL Me Some More
Lone Survivor: The eyewitness
account of Operation Red Wings and the lost heroes of SEAL team 10, authored by Navy SEAL Marcus
Luttrell, uses effective rhetoric from cover to cover.
The book, as a medium for the rhetoric shared by Mr. Luttrell, puts the reader
in his shoes,
becoming very situational as the reader turns its pages. Luttrell uses all
three parts of the rhetorical
triangle to get his message through to the reader. Furthermore, he takes
advantage of the
rhetorical terms much like other bestselling authors do too. Overall,
Luttrell’s account in rural
Afghanistan
includes very effective rhetoric and was a great read.
Lone Survivor uses effective rhetoric because
the book has an effective communicator: former
Navy SEAL and current author Marcus Luttrell. Because this book tells the story
in a first person
perspective, the lens through which Marcus Luttrell lived, credibility is
establish. Luttrell is an
accomplished Navy SEAL (SEALS are some of the most trustworthy and correct men)
with an
impressive array of metals and the skill in combat to back it up. Furthermore,
Luttrell tells the
story and expresses his opinions in an eloquent fashion. Saying it right and
saying it well are two
things Luttrell does, specifically in the core of the book when he retells
Operation Red Wings.
Although the plot is militaristic and combat oriented, the author uses details
in a fluid manner,
not too overwhelmingly goory and specific, but neither lacking specifics or
correct details.
A great example is when Luttrell describes his relationship with the village
elders and child
after he is brutally injured. As a SEAL and as an author, Luttrell explains the
bond he established
in great detail and how he established this bond, using the skills he learned
in BUD/S to do.
However, not all people agree that Luttrell was an effective communicator.
Luttrell is a SEAL,
not an accomplished author and his credibility as a writer is often challenged.
Although he has a
college degree, he lacks the English and writing skills other authors have.
But, in my mind,
Luttrell is effective as an author primarily because Lone Survivor is a firsthand account,
which he
remembers in detail.
Marcus
Luttrell uses effective rhetoric in Lone
Survivor because he recognizes the four keys of
the rhetorical situation. Luttrell exposes the exigence of Operation Red Wings
and explains
why the SEALs had to do what they did. Prior to going into detail about the
operation, Lutrell
briefs the issue to the audience in a biased but informative manner: Ahmad Shah
and his militia
has full control of Nangahar and ignores the demands from the Afghan
parliament. Lutrell acts as
more of documentarian than an author when he explains the purpose of the
mission: to wipe out
the ACM and Shah. This sort of lecture on what and why is very effective and
adds to the
rhetoric already included in the book. Luttrell also recalls the state of the
world, not only among
the SEALs but also among the Afghan community in Nangahar, who wanted its
leader wiped
out. But some might say Luttrell did not capture the state of the world because
he was not a
resident of the province Shah ruled; he did not fully understand the
circumstance. However, SEALs
and Luttrell are in direct contact with the Afghan villagers where Shah’s wrath
is seen. Luttrell
understands and sees firsthand the lack of progress seen in Nangahar and the
elders’ frustration with Shah. Critics might also argue that Luttrell’s
rhetoric is ineffective because
of his bias as a SEAL. He sees the state of the audience and the exigence
differently than the
readers of the book due. However, I would disagree with this claim because the
authors account
puts the reader in the shoes of Mr. Luttrell and the American people. This is a
prime example
of effective rhetoric because Lone
Survivor includes a rational exchange of opposing viewpoints,
not only Luttrell’s viewpoints.
Pluto
described rhetoric as the art of winning the soul by discourse. Marcus Luttrell’s
story of being
a lone survivor fulfills all the requirements as a medium. He not only is an
effective communicator
but also an effective author because he understands and exposes all parts of
the rhetorical
situation. Lone Survivor was both a great book and used
effective rhetoric to satisfy its readers.
I enjoyed this review Ryan. I liked how you explained very well the rhetorical components in this book, and went into further detail rather than just blatantly saying "this book uses______" and ending it there. And I agree with everything you said.
ReplyDelete-Cody
This review has me wanting to read Lone Survivor. Good war novels are real, gritty, yet not necessarily about the gory details. From your review of Lone survivor I really get the picture that the book gives a "boots on the ground" perspective of the politics and reality of fighting in Afghanistan.
ReplyDeleteGreat description of the rhetoric within this novel. I enjoyed your historical references and liked your comment about the implication of opposing view points in this novel. _Michael Walker
ReplyDeleteGood job on this essay Mr. Ryan Lee. You did a good job using the rhetoric triangle and comparing it's usage to what was provided in the book you "read". This paper seemed to go over as to what components of rhetoric was most properly used, and why it was effective. -Ben Grote
ReplyDeleteRyan, your review of this novel was very interesting. I enjoyed the detail you put used when describing the aspects of rhetorical situation. Overall I definitly agree with your position on lone survivor and believe your review does the book justice. -Ben Huebner
ReplyDelete