Lone Survivor
The novel Lone
Survivor by Marcus Luttrell took place in 2004 during operation Redwing, a
Navy SEAL operation, which was located in the Afghanistan Pakistan border. Four
very well-trained Navy SEALs were sent to that location to do some recon on
locating Bin Laden’s right-hand man Shamrack. During their mission some Afghan
goat herders discovered them lying in the bush, the four SEAL’s were then
forced to make the decision of their life, either kill them or let them go.
They made a difficult decision, and took the moral side by letting them leave
with their lives. The moral action they took led to the fiercest unmatched
firefight of their lives, leading to three American deaths and around 100
Taliban deaths. This fierce battle left the lone survivor Marcus Luttrell. Within this novel there are many cases of
rhetoric placed upon its pages. Overall the use of the rhetoric tactics were
emotional and inspiring and was aimed more towards individuals of the ages 16
to 35. These individuals were chosen because they could help support war
efforts against terrorist insurgents and Taliban in hopes to help ensure safety
to the American homeland.
Within this novel a main theme that
popped significantly was inspiration.
There were numerous inspirational moments throughout this novel that
seemed like rhetoric. One of the moments
was during Marcus’s intense BUD’s training to become a SEAL, he gave all of his
energy, sleep, and put his physical well-being on the line to continue the
training while almost 2/3’s of the applicants had dropped out. He was trying to promote the honor,
integrity, and perks that come along with becoming a Navy SEAL. He was also very talkative about his
political beliefs throughout the novel with him describing why the republicans
were without a doubt were correct at defending America by invading Iraq and
Afghanistan. Another very inspirational
moment that occurred in the novel was when they had first been noticed by
Afghan goat herders on their top secret mission. When they were noticed they strategized over
the benefit for themselves by killing the Afghans, but they didn’t want to do
it because they didn’t want to kill the innocent or end up on the liberal news
back in America. Their moral act seemed
to have more justified by the chance of Aljazeera news reporting what they did
back in America. In the novel Marcus
said multiple times that he regretted his decision of letting them live. A third inspiring rhetorical moment occurred
during their firefight when they were all shot up with broken bones and they
did not stop apprehending the enemy because they were hard core American
soldiers who would not give up to the enemies of America. A fourth example is after the main battle is
over and Marcus returns home and recovers from his injuries he then returns to
two more tours in Iraq because he wanted revenge for the death of his fellow
comrades and the 9/11 attack. These examples
give readers an Ethos, Pathos, and Logos message and an urgency to go to war
for American and stand up for your fellow Americans and the security of the
country itself.
In this novel Pathos was a very
prominent subject in many cases that causes a great amount of feeling for what
they went through. The use of Pathos was
a good use of rhetoric to make the reader want to get involved. The majority of the emotional parts of this
novel took place during the epic firefight of a battle of four against around
200. One very emotional part took place
when Dietz was suppressing the enemy and he was shot multiple times including
getting his thumb shot off, he still apprehended the enemy taking a blow to the
knee were Marcus picked him up and put him on his back where he then died in
Marcus’s hands. This was a very bad
moral buster that made the audience very sad of the SEAL’s situation. Then Murphy sacrificed himself by climbing to
the top of the cliff so he could radio in help to save the two remaining SEAL’s. This courageous act was very emotional and
very rhetorical in proving the bravery of the combatants who fight for
America. Then Axe took a bullet to the
head which left Marcus all by himself to hide from the rest of the Taliban
soldiers. Marcus was then paralyzed from
waist down for a few hours after taking shrapnel to the legs from a Rocket
Propelled Grenade. All of these
incidents were great rhetorical strengths that are very motivating and help
rely the message from this novel.
Almost all the rhetorical examples
from this novel covered all the necessary themes and exigence to be an
effective rhetorical message. The
communicator is the US military relying the message to help support war efforts
to people who may want to fight or to motivate people who are already
fighting. The state of the world was
appropriate for this message to come out because of the hatred of terrorists
because of the heinous acts they committed against the innocent. The other side may argue that this book is
not intended to get people to enlist but just to use this as a recollection to
be put in the history books and to show the integrity and the toughness of the
US military. I feel this novel is
rhetorical to get more people involved in the war because it explains all the
steps it takes to become a solider and can make you feel invincible by being an
American soldier. Also this book is very
politically bias by representing many religious and right or left winged
beliefs.
You made a great point in the beggining elaborating upon the message of Lone Survivor. You explained his message well (getting people to enlist) and the pathos with which Luttrell used in order to convey his message strategically. I also liked how you touched on who the communicator is and why they conveyed the message that they did. You made a good counter claim and did a great job of shooting down what the other side might have to offer. Also, I liked how you pointed out the bias in the book at the end.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great and accurate review. I liked how you made it seem as if the author was someone you know. You answered the question and addressed all the points of rhetoric in you review. I also like how you pointed out the bias at the end.
ReplyDelete