Blink
One of the best ways to get a
message across to a specific audience is by doing that through a rhetoric
piece. The three main elements of rhetoric literature provides the reader with
a message, communicator, and audience. The author wants the audience to gain
more knowledge towards a certain situation as well as change the state of the
audience when introducing the new information. The perfect example of a
literature artwork that possesses these elements would be Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. It is a book that tells the reader the
process of decision making and instincts. Blink
provides a reader with examples of logos, pathos and other literary devices.
This book provides the reader with an effective rhetoric message.
So, throughout the book there are
numerous of psychological tests that are the authors way of proving that short
glimpses of things can tell a lot about a person or situation. The author is
providing the element of logos through the experiments in the different
studies. There is a psychologist named John Gottman who goes through various
tests where he studies peoples behaviors. He gains knowledge of the people by
observing them having a conversation for a few minutes, As they talk John is
observing for facial expressions, body language, and gestures. John is so
accurate with his analysis that “if he analyzes an hour (of a married couple
talking), he can predict with 95 percent accuracy whether that couple will
still be married fifteen years later. If he watches a couple for fifteen
minutes, his success rate is around 90 percent” (Gladwell 10). John is able to prove through careful
examinations that he accurately can be able to predict things based upon
observations in a short amount of time, and that he can just as well as when he
takes more time to observe and think. In a way the author is providing the
audience with a logos and ethos appeal. Malcolm uses logical reasons along with
using experts to back up the reasons why the results ended up the way they did
to give the reader assurance of the new data. Some could argue that the average
person would never be able to read someones body language so accurately and be
able to judge a person just from that. That would be a false assumption though.
According to psychologist Nalini Ambady who gave students a video clip of
teachers to judge how good of a teacher they were, “A person watching a silent
two-second video clip of a teacher he or she has never met will reach
conclusions about how good that teacher is that are very similar to those of a
student who has sat in the teacher’s class for an entire semester” (7). Body
language can be picked up by anyone if they pay attention to all the movements
and signs. A persons body language is very informational and tells people a lot
about a person. Malcolm effectively makes sure to give the reader perfect
examples to assure the facts.
Also, there is evidence that people
do not always make the right decision when evaluating something quickly.
Gladwell brings up an example of the election of 1914 for the U.S. Senate which
was a terrible election. A candidate named Warren Hardening, “at the time (was)
about 35 years old. His head, features, shoulders and torso had a size that
attracted attention; their proportions to each other made an effect which in
any male at any place would justify more than the term handsome” (27). Everyone
looked at his physical appearance and thought he was the perfect Senate without
truly seeing if he was obligated to be a senator. People would describe him as, “vague and
ambivalent on matters of policy. His speeches were once described as “an army
of pompous phrases moving over the landscape in search of an idea.”” (27).
There is more than a person's physical appearance that should influence peoples
votes. The most beauty people in the world are not always built to be leaders.
Intelligence, leadership, and heart are not something that is always visible.
Some could say that confidence is something that has to be visible in order to
be a leader, but there is a thin line between confidence and cockiness. The
main concept I feel like Malcolm wants the reader to grasp is to research
things do not just believe everything you see.
Finally, I think Malcolm did a
excellent job of using rhetoric effectively. He made sure to not only give us
facts, but he provided a reliable source to back up the facts. I think after
reading this book that I will start to notice things more often than I normally
would not have. I’m gonna be a little more aware of certain expressions and
body language.
Good job explaining the components of rhetoric to your audience in you paper, Isaiah. It is good to briefly explain what the rhetoric triangle is, so your audience will be informed of what it is in case they don't have previous knowledge of it. You did a good job saying you learned a lesson from the message in the book, which shows that this novel you read does a good job conveying something important to its audience.
ReplyDeleteHello there Isaiah. I really liked how in your first body paragraph you explained how the author wrote the book with experiments and studies. The short glimpses of the studies that you talked about gave great insight to people who would want to read this book. Nice job.
ReplyDelete-Max Peters